"I'm sorry, this is a very late reply. I hope you've grown up by now, and you can laugh along with me, as you have just about brightened my day with this hilarious statement.

"Loser, I'm a teenager, I would totally win this in a snap if we had this argument in person."

Haha! Do you get the joke? It makes no sense!

Please, can someone explain to me how the sentence is supposed to be sequitar? How can being a teenager have any relation to your ability in debating in person? By the way, I think everyone could guess you were a teenager without that. You didn't have to explicitly state it in a manner which made no sense what-so-ever. Were you trying to show-off or something? "See, you're fighting with a 13 year old!" Because it obviously didn't work.

Also, I fail to see how debating in person is any different from debating online. Except for the fact that it's harder to justify your sources immediately... and the only one who has even been giving fact and citing sources is =Zilleniose So basically, you're saying you'd WIN if she was not giving facts and pretty much kicking your ass throughout the entire debate?

It seems to me that all you did with that last, useless statement is prove your own inadequence at debating. It completely MISSED it's supposed intentional target at belittling her.

Okay, I'm done. Not to say loving animals isn't bad or anything. I love them. All this girl was saying is that HER OPINION was that the PeTA was going about their job of saving animals and that she prefers the SPCA. That's all there is. She doesn't hate animals."


Guess what guys? IT'S THE ANNIVERSARY OF THAT FIGHT TODAY! My fight with =Zilleniose!
No really, that is the most special interuption I've ever gotten! Someone telling me that I'M WRONG. This is going to be such a good day! I have the most goofy smile on my face because of it.